Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ASSESSMENT OF THE CHEMOMECHANICAL CARIES REMOVING EFFICACY

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2003³â 30±Ç 3È£ p.406 ~ 414
ÇѼö°æ, ±èÁ¤¿í, ÀÌ»óŹ, ±è±¤³², Á¶º´ÈÆ, À̽¿ì,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÇѼö°æ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁ¤¿í (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ»óŹ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±è±¤³² (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
Á¶º´ÈÆ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
À̽¿ì (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°ÇÀü Ä¡ÁúÀ» ÃÖ´ëÇÑ º¸Á¸ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ´Â ³ë·ÂÀÇ ÀÏȯÀ¸·Î È­ÇС¤±â°èÀû ¿ì½Ä Á¦°Å¹ýÀÌ °³¹ßµÇ¾ú´Ù. Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ ¼Õ»ó ¾øÀÌ 3Â÷¿ø ÀڷḦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹Ì¼¼ Àü»êÈ­ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ°ú V works programÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÀÌ ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ¿ì½Ä Á¦°Å È¿´ÉÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 1±ºÀº °ÇÀü »ó¾ÆÁú, ¿ì½Ä »ó¾ÆÁú, È­ÇС¤±â°èÀû ¹æ¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© Çü¼ºµÈ ¿Íµ¿º®ÀÇ ¹Ðµµ°ªÀ» ±¸ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 2±ºÀº °ÇÀü »ó¾ÆÁú, °í¼Ó ȸÀü Àý»è ±â±¸¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© Çü¼ºµÈ ¿Íµ¿º®, ¿©±â¿¡ Ãß°¡·Î È­ÇС¤±â°èÀû ¿ì½Ä Á¦°Å ¿ë¾×À» Àû¿ëÇÑ ÈÄÀÇ ¿Íµ¿º®ÀÇ ¹Ðµµ¸¦ ±¸ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù.
1. Carisolv^(TM)·Î ¿ì½ÄÀ» Á¦°ÅÇÑ ÈÄÀÇ ¿Íµ¿º® »ó¾ÆÁúÀÇ ¹Ðµµ°ªÀº Á¤»ó »ó¾ÆÁú ¹Ðµµ°ªÀÇ 81.8%À̾ú´Ù(p<0.001).
2. Bur¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ¿ì½ÄÀ» Á¦°ÅÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ¿Íµ¿º®°ú Á¤»ó »ó¾ÆÁú ¹Ðµµ°ª¿¡ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù(p=0.234).
Chemomechanical approach to caries removal was introduced in order to preserve the maximum amount of sound tooth structure. The efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal was assessed using microcomputed tomography which offers 3 dimensional data without destroying the tooth, and the V works program. In group 1, the density values of the sound dentin, carious dentin, and remaining dentin after chemomechanical treatment were analyzed. In group 2, the density values of the sound dentin, cavity wall prepared using high speed bur, and the remaining dentin after additional CarisolvTM gel application on the same cavity were analyzed. The results were as follows:
1. The density value of the remaining dentin after the CarisolvTM treatment was 81.8% of the sound dentin(p C 0.001).
2. The density value of the remaining dentin after the conventional rotary instrument showed no statistically significant difference from that of the sound dentin(p = 0.234).

Å°¿öµå

È­ÇÐ;±â°èÀû ¿ì½ÄÁ¦°Å;¿ì½ÄÁ¦°Å È¿´É;¹Ì¼¼ Àü»êÈ­ ´ÜÃþ ÃÔ¿µ;¹Ðµµ°ª;Chemomechanical caries removal;Caries removing efficacy;Microcomputed tomography;Density value

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI